Dispute over mental health call for veterans and ‘blue light’ services

A vote was required to approve Armagh City, Banbridge and Craigavon Borough Council’s response to a draft mental health strategy with some councillors taking issue with the specific mention of “veterans and blue light services”.
Watch more of our videos on Shots! 
and live on Freeview channel 276
Visit Shots! now

Council’s proposed response to the Department for Health’s mental health strategy 2021-2031 came before Council’s environmental services committee.

Committee Chair, Councillor Darryn Causby said he would liked to see reference to “youth services” in the section of the response concerning schools and pre-schools. Councillor Keith Haughian said this was a “fair comment” and proposed the response be approved.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Alderman Glenn Barr welcomed the “detailed report” on an issue that is “quite close” to his heart.

Craigavon Civic CentreCraigavon Civic Centre
Craigavon Civic Centre

He stressed the importance of ensuring the document’s proposed tailored hubs are actually tailored to geographical need as, “issues in Belfast are not the same as issues in Rathfriland” and noted veterans and blue light services were not mentioned throughout the document.

“There is no mention of veterans or blue light services and they should be included in this document,” said Alderman Barr.

“If we are going to do something right, we should do it right now and I am proposing that we include a reference to veterans and blue lights services in the document.”

This proposal was seconded by Alderman Ian Burns.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

However, Councillor Keith Haughian said he had an issue with any particular group being singled out for mention.

“As I read through the report there are three or four groups I can think of that could and should be looked at,” said Cllr Haughian.

“I sort of thought someone might try to include an individual group in this tonight. I have no issue with that group, lets be clear mental health does not discriminate.

“I’m just not sure if that is the message we want to send in these consultation responses. My concern is that it could come across as Council suggesting one group should supersede others.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

“I suspect that is not what Alderman Barr is suggesting but that is what will come out of this if we do it that way.”

The Chair, Councillor Darryn Causby said he would take this as an objection to the proposal which would put the matter to a vote.

Alliance Party group leader, Councillor Eoin Tennyson said he had no objection to what had been proposed but sought officer advice on how the wording could be included in the document.

“Mental health is something we can all unite about,” he said. “It would simply be crass to push this to a vote. If we can find a wording that would be agreeable to all, it would be a good way forward.”

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

The Chair said it was officers role to find the correct location for the inclusion of veteran and blue light services and he would trust their expertise in doing so. He also said he was not looking to take the matter to a vote.

At this point, Councillor Paul Duffy attempted to raise a point of order suggesting to include veterans and blue light services would have an equality and good relations impact.

The Chair reminded Cllr Duffy that should a member wish to raise a point of order they are required to draw attention to the very specific standing order they feel is being broken. Cllr Causby said he would give Cllr Duffy some time to find the appropriate standing order and “then I will address the issue”.

Minutes later, the Chair said as Cllr Duffy had not been able to find the standing order he wished to raise the matter would proceed to a vote.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Alderman Barr, Burns, Kennedy and Rankin voted in favour of the proposal to include veterans and blue light services in the consultation response as did councillors Baxter, Greenfield, McIlwrath, Pope, Tennyson, Macauley and Causby.

Councillors Duffy, Haughey, Haughian, Larkham, McNeill, and Toman voted against the proposal.

With a total of 11 votes in favour to six against Alderman Barr’s proposal was approved.

Flytipping incidents soar - read here

Editor’s message:

Thank you for reading this article. We’re more reliant on your support than ever as the shift in consumer habits brought about by Coronavirus impacts our advertisers.

Please consider purchasing a copy of the paper. You can also support trusted, fact-checked journalism by taking out a digital subscription of the News Letter.